<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Booklornannotations | Booklorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booklorn.com/tag/annotations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booklorn.com</link>
	<description>Books I Have Known</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bookish links for May 27</title>
		<link>http://www.booklorn.com/bookish-links-for-may-27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.booklorn.com/bookish-links-for-may-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Booklorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podiobooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scribd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Harwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombie bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booklorn.com/?p=2480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some more interesting links that I came across this week, mostly through Twitter: #1: Apparently Apple thought it should be censoring what you can read on your iPod/iPhone by rejecting applications that might, possibly, let you read something they find objectionable. The latest instance concerned a book reader application called Eucalyptus, but it&#8217;s been going...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more interesting links that I came across this week, mostly through Twitter:</p>
<p>#1: Apparently Apple thought it should be censoring what you can read on your iPod/iPhone by rejecting applications that might, possibly, let you read something they find objectionable. The latest instance <a title="Eucalyptus being rejected by Apple because users could read Kama Sutra on it." href="http://www.blog.montgomerie.net/whither-eucalyptus">concerned a book reader application called Eucalyptus</a>, but <a title="Apple rejects comic book app because comic book content objectionable." href="http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/apple-forfeits-ebooks-by-banning-a-comic-book/">it&#8217;s been going on for a while</a>. After they started getting some bad PR over this, <a title="Apple thinks twice and approves Eucalyptus app." href="http://www.macworld.com/article/140764/2009/05/eucalyptus.html">they finally went ahead and approved the application</a>.</p>
<p>#2: <a title="Stinque Zombie Bible" href="http://zombie.stinque.com/bible/Genesis_1">Somebody rewrote the Bible to include zombies.</a> I&#8217;ve included it because a) it amuses me for some unspecified reason and b) it amazes me that someone would take the time to do this. Click at your own risk.</p>
<p>#3: Publishing continues to not &#8220;get&#8221; the Internet (okay, admitedly that in and of itself is not news, however new examples surface every day). <a title="Avon editors interview" href="http://www.likesbooks.com/avon2009.html">Editors at Avon Books gave an interview</a> over at <a title="All About Romance" href="http://www.likesbooks.com/">All About Romance</a>. The bit that has online reviewers scratching their heads is the bit about Avon&#8217;s view on online review sites not being worthwhile unless they can &#8220;make&#8221; a book.</p>
<p>Once again publishing looks at the Internet as simply the offline world put online, which it is not. If they&#8217;re waiting for a single review site to have the clout of Publisher&#8217;s Weekly or The New York Times then they are missing what working with online reviewers is all about: buzz, word-of-mouth, trust, etc. The other things they said didn&#8217;t particularly impress me much.</p>
<p>#4: And then there is Seth Harwood who <a title="How I sold my book by giving it away." href="http://www.openculture.com/2009/05/how_i_sold_my_book_by_giving_it_away.html">gets how to use the Internet to get attention for his books</a> (also a publishing contract from Random House!). I found it interesting that having his work in front of an audience, even for free, has pushed him to produce more.</p>
<p>#5: An interesting take on how the added value in ebooks may actually be the readers who read the book before you. It&#8217;s slightly more complex than that, but <a title="Clive Thompson on the Future of Reading in a Digital World" href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-06/st_thompson">an interesting take on the value added by reader discussions and annotations in ebook editions</a>.</p>
<p>#6: A big fat *yawn* from me that <a title="Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/" target="_blank">Scribd.com</a> now allows anyone to sell documents (including ebooks) on their site. They let authors set the price and set download/DRM options. Scribd gets 20%. There&#8217;s a lot of hype about this. Sounds good, so why the yawn? The store is US-only. Not an American citizen living in the US? No book selling for you. So much for the &#8220;global&#8221; Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booklorn.com/bookish-links-for-may-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

