<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Booklorncopyright | Booklorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booklorn.com/tag/copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booklorn.com</link>
	<description>Books I Have Known</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vanity Fair Displaying Pirated Content?</title>
		<link>http://www.booklorn.com/vanity-fair-displaying-pirated-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.booklorn.com/vanity-fair-displaying-pirated-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Booklorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television/Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wallace & Gromit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booklorn.com/?p=3620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[February 14, 2010: It appears that the video has now been removed from the Vanity Fair article. Too bad they didn't have a clear enough ethical policy to avoid the issue in the first place.] I&#8217;ve been swamped this week so I haven&#8217;t had a chance to do any blog posts, but I came across...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[February 14, 2010: It appears that the video has now been removed from the Vanity Fair article. Too bad they didn't have a clear enough ethical policy to avoid the issue in the first place.]</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been swamped this week so I haven&#8217;t had a chance to do any blog posts, but I came across <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2010/02/video-best-animated-short-wallace-and-gromit-vs-psycho-ronald-mcdonald.html#entry-more">the latest Wallace &amp; Gromit movie on the Vanity Fair web site</a> and thought I&#8217;d share it with you. I love Nick Park&#8217;s storytelling and I&#8217;m not the only one&#8211;once again, a Wallace &amp; Gromit short is up for an Oscar in the short film category.</p>
<p>But then I looked at the source of the video on the <em>Vanity Fair</em> site.</p>
<p>Surely, <em>Vanity Fair</em> would have an official source for the movie they&#8217;re displaying, right? I mean traditional media outlets get very cranky when you pirate their writing and such, so surely they would respect the copyright of other professionals.</p>
<p>Right?</p>
<p>It turns out that the source of the video is a MySpace profile for some 19-year-old in the UK who is NOT Nick Parks or <a title="Wallace &amp; Gromit Official MySpace page" href="http://www.myspace.com/wallaceandgromitfans">the official MySpace page for Wallace &amp; Gromit</a>. And <a title="Wallace &amp; Gromit Official Site" href="http://www.wallaceandgromit.com/">the official web site for Wallace &amp; Gromit</a> only lets you look at clips of the new movie <em>Loaf and Death</em>, presumably because the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001OC6RZA?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=shereaboo09-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B001OC6RZA">money is made on the DVDs</a> or iTunes downloads.</p>
<p>Looks like a pirated movie. Smells like a pirated movie. Walks like a pirated movie.</p>
<p>What am I to think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booklorn.com/vanity-fair-displaying-pirated-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting links for September 10, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-september-10-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-september-10-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Booklorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[character names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McClelland & Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booklorn.com/?p=2955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naming characters with Google adwords; Publishers outsource subsidiary rights management; Geeky handmade iPhone holders.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a few links this week since I am busy catching up on all the work I was supposed to get done while on vacation but didn&#8217;t end up doing (I tested a gluten-free, sugar-free cookbook and read free Harlequin downloads instead&#8211;will post about that soon). Anyhoodle, here&#8217;s a link or two:</p>
<p>#1: I know naming characters is tough, but this is the first time I&#8217;ve heard of someone <a title="Naming characters with Google adwords" href="http://robinsloan.com/2009/52/#more-52">doing market research with Google adwords to name their character</a>. It&#8217;s interesting to see that names <em>do</em> make a difference. Now I&#8217;m curious if there are class or culture biases at work with the names&#8211;too bad the author doesn&#8217;t reveal the names. <img src='http://www.booklorn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>#2: Not sure what to make of this: <a title="Changes afoot at Random House Canada and McClelland &amp; Stewart" href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/afterword/archive/2009/09/08/changes-afoot-at-random-house-of-canada-and-McClelland-_2600_-Stewart.aspx">Random House Canada and McClelland &amp; Stewart are closing their rights departments</a> and outsourcing subsidiary rights sales/management to an independent agency. From the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Cooke Agency International will handle the selling and licensing of foreign rights, permissions, and dometic book club sales. The selling of first and second serial rights will be handled by the Publicity departments of each company.</p></blockquote>
<p>#3: Got an iPhone or an iPod Touch? Love handmade, geeky stuff? <a title="Yummypocket Etsy store" href="http://www.etsy.com/shop.php?user_id=7789013">Yummypocket</a> over at Etsy makes some really neat holders for the iPhone including <a title="Etch-a-Sketch iPhone holder" href="http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=30540212">an Etch-a-Sketch holder</a> and a cassette holder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-september-10-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting links for August 6, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-august-6-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-august-6-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Booklorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justine Larbalestier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pooh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booklorn.com/?p=2824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Piglet quarantined; Spy Stiletto Spy School; The Bad Sex Awards; Erotic Brain Bleach.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve collected far too many links this week (so nothing new here). Enjoy:</p>
<p>#1: I&#8217;m a Winnie-the-Pooh fan (some of you know this) so I couldn&#8217;t pass up the <a title="Swine flu. Why risk it?" href="http://www.icanhasmotivation.com/swine-flu-why-risk-it/">100 Acre Wood&#8217;s solution to swine flu</a>. Poor Piglet.</p>
<p>#2: Learn to be a James Bond girl and kick ass by spending a weekend at the <a title="Stiletto Spy School - MSNBC Story" href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/32218342/ns/today-today_fashion_and_beauty/">Stiletto Spy School</a> in Las Vegas (where else?).</p>
<p>#3: While discussing the merits of snark and written sex scenes (don&#8217;t ask), I was reminded of The Bad Sex Award for literature, &#8220;Britain&#8217;s most dreaded literary prize.&#8221; You can read the shortlisted passages here (theoretically not-safe-for-work and if you only read one then 2003 is the best/worst): <a title="THe Bad Sex Awards: Shortlisted Passages 2008" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/nov/25/bad-sex-award-shortlist">2008</a>, <a title="THe Bad Sex Awards: Shortlisted Passages 2007" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/nov/27/awardsandprizes.badsexaward">2007</a>, <a title="THe Bad Sex Awards: Shortlisted Passages 2006" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2006/nov/29/awardsandprizes.badsexaward1">2006</a>, <a title="THe Bad Sex Awards: Shortlisted Passages 2005" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/nov/28/fiction.awardsandprizes">2005</a>, <a title="THe Bad Sex Awards: Shortlisted Passages 2004" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2004/dec/14/awardsandprizes.badsexaward">2004</a>. <strong><a title="THe Bad Sex Awards: Shortlisted Passages 2003" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2003/dec/04/awardsandprizes.badsexaward">2003</a></strong>, <a title="THe Bad Sex Awards: Shortlisted Passages 2002" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/dec/04/awardsandprizes.badsexaward">2002</a> (there are nine more years if you are so inclined). You may wish to bleach your eyes afterward and/or write letters of protest to the offending authors.</p>
<p>#4: Speaking of #3, I was also sent this link in which <a title="Erotic Brain Bleach by Saranna DeWylde" href="http://sarannadewylde.blogspot.com/2009/07/erotic-brain-bleach.html">an erotica editor pleads for authors to stop using some rather bizarre euphemisms</a>. I&#8217;m not sure which group of writers offends more.</p>
<p>#5: In a bid to cut itself off from the rest of the Internet, <a title="Quote 5 words from the Associated Press? That'll be $12.50 please." href="http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/">AP has decided to charge anyone who quotes more than 4 words of any of their stories at the princely sum of $2.50 USD/word</a>. Who&#8217;s going to link to them, thereby sending them traffic, at that price? No one, that&#8217;s who. I know news agencies need to make money from their online content, but this is not going to get them there. Speaking of which, News Corp. is taking a different approach (but one that&#8217;s been tried before) by <a title="News Corp to charge readers" href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/News-Corp-to-charge-for-all-news-websites-pd20090806-UMS5P?OpenDocument">charging their readers for online content</a>. Good luck with that. I can see it working for a niche news service, but not for a general news service&#8211;too many alternate sources of information.</p>
<p>#6: I posted a link to author Justine Larbalestier&#8217;s thoughts on the misleading cover on her book Liar in a previous links edition. This week, <a title="A New Look for 'Liar'" href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6675065.html?nid=2788">the publisher is giving in to pressure from the Internet and changing the US cover.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-august-6-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

