<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Booklornreviewing | Booklorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booklorn.com/tag/reviewing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booklorn.com</link>
	<description>Books I Have Known</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Links for July 9, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-july-9-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-july-9-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Booklorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@kingrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alan dean foster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booklorn.com/?p=2677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should authors respond to negative reviews; judging a book by its cover; Alan Dean Foster to do 1st book in new Star Trek universe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My weekly round up of &#8220;interesting stuff I found while procrastinating&#8221;:</p>
<p>#1: Blogger <a title="(not so) Bad Authors" href="http://reading.kingrat.biz/afflatus/not-so-bad-author#comment-2784">King Rat on authors behaving badly towards reviewers who write negative reviews</a>. I agree that authors have the right to respond to negative reviews. It may not necessarily be productive depending on how it is done, but if they feel the need they are entitled to do it. I don&#8217;t think authors have the right to encourage stalking by handing out reviewers&#8217; personal contact details and trying to inflame readers to contact reviewer (or worse).</p>
<p>#2: <a title="Judging a book by its cover" href="http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=blog&amp;id=36432&amp;j=20381540&amp;e=free-book-leads@booklorn.com&amp;l=15162145_HTML&amp;u=236287167&amp;mid=83886&amp;jb=0">An interesting piece over on Tor.com by Brian James</a> on whether we should judge a book by its cover. I have to admit that I&#8217;m guilty of this. This is one area where self-published books really shoot themselves in the foot because the covers invariably have a quality that marks them as self-published.</p>
<p>#3: It looks like<a title="Alan Dean Foster to write sequel to Star Trek movie" href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/02/alan-dean-foster-to-write-sequel-book-to-star-trek-movie/"> Alan Dean Foster is writing the first book in the new Star Trek universe</a>, following his novelization of this summer&#8217;s movie. The novelization was listed at $20 for the paperback which I thought was a ridiculous price&#8211;even regular Star Trek books are priced ridiculously for the &#8220;Harlequin&#8221; of sci-fi. No news on whether regular pricing will return with this book. If you read the article closely you&#8217;ll see that there is already a sequel to this summer&#8217;s movie in the works (news to me, but then I don&#8217;t keep up on these things).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.booklorn.com/interesting-links-for-july-9-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

